Home Introduction to HOP 2 Activities Site Index | Order | Contact Us | Search | Links

Comparison Matrix for Abrasion Results

This data chart is very robust and help students collect and organize data as well as helping students to begin the analysis of data. Determining Similarities and Differences is also an excellent way to deepen understanding. Using the comparison matrix as a data collection device and a graphic organizer will help students to write better conclusions at the end of an inquiry activity.

Comparison Matrix for Abrasion Results
Characteristics Samples to be Compared: Brand X Vinyl Tile Squares tested for abrasion resistance to various grits  
60 grit 100 grit 150 grit  
1. Color In the abraded area were different colors of brown from a pale light brown to nearly white. The abraded area was a tan color and fairly uniform. The abraded area was light brown and in some parts of the abraded area there was hardly any color change. Similarities: all samples became lighter after abrasion.
Differences: The bigger grit caused changed the color more dramatically from brown to very light pale brown. The 100-grit was a tan color and the 150-grit sample was a light brown.
2. Texture You could feel slight to deep scratches. You could feel, a slightly rougher texture from the area not abraded. You could hardly feel the difference from the area not abraded. Similarities: all 3 felt less smooth
Differences: As the grit size increased, the texture changed more.
3. Surface Destruction There was a lot of destruction. The abradant removed the vinyl top in some areas. You could see thin lines that cut through the surface of the vinyl. You had to look really close to see the abrasion. Surface was pretty much in tack. Similarities: The 100 and 150-grit caused minor surface destruction
Differences: The 60 grit paper caused visible damage to the surface.
4. Number of strokes with the abradant 10 30 60 Similarities: None
Differences: The sandpaper with larger grit pieces caused abrasion faster

Comparison Matrix table is from Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

back to top

Comparison Matrix
Characteristics Items to be Compared:  
Sample #1 Sample #2  
1.     Similarities:
Differences:
2.     Similarities:
Differences:
3.     Similarities:
Differences:
4     Similarities:
Differences:
5.     Similarities:
Differences:
6.     Similarities:
Differences:

Comparison Matrix table is from Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

back to top


Similarities and Differences

 

Name: _____________________________

 

Overlapping circles illustration

back to top

introduction to hop2 | activities | order CD | site index | contact us | search | links | home
hop | hopjr

© 2007, American Chemistry Council. All rights reserved.
1300 Wilson Blvd., Arlington VA 22209
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy