 |
Comparison
Matrix for Abrasion Results
This data chart is very robust and help students collect and organize
data as well as helping students to begin the analysis of data. Determining
Similarities and Differences is also an excellent way to deepen understanding.
Using the comparison matrix as a data collection device and a graphic
organizer will help students to write better conclusions at the end of
an inquiry activity.
Comparison
Matrix for Abrasion Results |
| Characteristics |
Samples to be Compared: Brand X Vinyl Tile Squares
tested for abrasion resistance to various grits |
|
| 60 grit |
100 grit |
150 grit |
|
| 1. Color |
In the abraded area were different colors of brown from
a pale light brown to nearly white. |
The abraded area was a tan color and fairly uniform.
|
The abraded area was light brown and in some parts
of the abraded area there was hardly any color change. |
Similarities: all samples became lighter after abrasion. |
| Differences: The bigger grit caused changed the color more dramatically
from brown to very light pale brown. The 100-grit was a tan color
and the 150-grit sample was a light brown. |
| 2. Texture |
You could feel slight to deep scratches. |
You could feel, a slightly rougher texture from the
area not abraded. |
You could hardly feel the difference from the area not
abraded. |
Similarities: all 3 felt less smooth |
| Differences: As the grit size increased, the texture changed more. |
| 3. Surface Destruction |
There was a lot of destruction. The abradant removed
the vinyl top in some areas. |
You could see thin lines that cut through the surface
of the vinyl. |
You had to look really close to see the abrasion. Surface
was pretty much in tack. |
Similarities: The 100 and 150-grit caused minor surface destruction |
| Differences: The 60 grit paper caused visible damage to the surface. |
| 4. Number of strokes with the abradant |
10 |
30 |
60 |
Similarities: None |
| Differences: The sandpaper with larger grit pieces caused abrasion
faster |
Comparison Matrix table is from Marzano,
R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction
that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
back to top
Comparison
Matrix |
| Characteristics |
Items to be Compared: |
|
| Sample #1 |
Sample #2 |
|
| 1. |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
| 2. |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
| 3. |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
| 4 |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
| 5. |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
| 6. |
|
|
Similarities: |
| Differences: |
Comparison Matrix table is from Marzano,
R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction
that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
back to top
Similarities and Differences
Name: _____________________________

back to top
|