Contact Us

Andrew Fasoli
(202) 249-6521

WASHINGTON (June 14, 2019) – Today, the American Chemistry Council issued the following statement after Governor Janet Mills signed into law LD 1433 – legislation to ban the use of FDA-reviewed chemicals in food packaging.

“This misguided legislation threatens sound science and the interests of Maine consumers by banning an entire class of chemicals in food contact materials and paving the way for the potential ban of another, regardless of the differences between different members of the class. Individual chemicals are often unique, with differing characteristics, structures and intended uses. Painting all chemicals that share some generic name with a broad brush makes bad policy that can prevent consumers from accessing important, safe and beneficial products that they need.

“In the U.S., all food contact substances are reviewed by the FDA, and FDA can only provide approval for a food contact substance if the agency concludes that there is sufficient scientific data to demonstrate that the substance is safe for its intended use. Through rigorous analysis, the health experts at the FDA have reviewed and determined to be safe for their intended use certain members of these families of PFAS and phthalate chemistries that are now being banned or could soon be banned. State prohibitions for food packaging materials create consumer confusion and erode public confidence in FDA and in the safety of the nation’s food regulations. This misguided bill ignores the science and the FDA review process and those that will be harmed the most are Maine businesses and consumers.

“In fact, the Maine Grocers and Food Producers Association and the Maine Forest Products Council have both stated that this legislation will impact the supply chain and the sale of products. The Maine Grocers and Food Producers Association also made clear that this bill will put local and state businesses at a disadvantage compared to large, national corporations.

“We hope that Governor Mills and the Maine Legislature will revisit this legislation when they see the negative impact this has for their constituents.”

Background:

All phthalates are not the same. For instance, the hazard potential for di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) and di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP) has been studied for over 20 years. There is overwhelming evidence that these high molecular weight phthalates have been proven safe for their intended use and are permitted in food contact applications all over the world. Additionally, the regulation of phthalates in food packaging has been under active review by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) since March of 2016. The FDA review is being conducted in a timely and thorough manner with a decision now pending.

Additionally, PFAS used in food packaging were reviewed and found to be safe for their intended use. Any argument that the PFAS currently approved by FDA for use in food packaging present some significant risk to consumers is neither risk-based nor supported by the robust body of scientific data on these substances.

News

News & Resources

View our resource center to find press releases, testimonies, infographics and more.

Jobs