Take Action! Tell Congress to prevent a devastating rail strike.

  • Read time: 4 minutes
  • Press Release

ACC Calls for Reset Following a Review of Transparency and Objectivity Issues with EPA's Draft Formaldehyde IRIS Assessment

Raises Concerns Around Process Irregularities, Conflicts of Interest, and Potential Bias

CONTACT US
Tom Flanagin
CONTACT US

WASHINGTON (April 5, 2022) — Today, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) is releasing findings from its review of the processes for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System’s (IRIS) draft formaldehyde assessment that suggest the draft document will fail to meet the agency’s standards for unwavering transparency, scientific integrity, and a robust, independent peer review process. 

The IRIS program’s approach to performing scientific assessments has a troubling history and has been criticized for years for producing overly conservative reports that are out of step with current science. Utilizing public documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), ACC’s analysis reveals a troubling pattern of process irregularities, lack of independence, bias, and conflicts of interest that demonstrates a need for greater scrutiny and transparency. 

More specifically, ACC’s topline findings reveal:
  • Key officials involved in the National Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) upcoming review appear to have violated basic standards regarding independence, bias, and balance in the peer-review process. For example, the lead NAS staff officer was directly involved in developing the assessment under review while working at EPA.
  • EPA is violating its own IRIS process and policies by ambiguously prioritizing this assessment in 2021 and failing to include critical steps, like a systematic review protocol for formaldehyde to allow peer reviewers and the public to determine if EPA is appropriately evaluating the science.
  • The draft formaldehyde IRIS assessment lacked a thorough formal interagency review to ensure robust participation from all relevant other federal agencies, as well as the public.

Industry has consistently called for any formaldehyde assessment to use transparent, science-based standards and has diligently supported peer-reviewed published studies that improve understanding of formaldehyde.

“The IRIS program is not fulfilling its mission. The program has long had deficiencies, especially as it relates to formaldehyde. ACC has consistently called upon EPA to improve the design and conduct of its chemical assessments,” said Chris Jahn, President and CEO, ACC.

Chris Jahn, President and CEO, American Chemistry Council
Now, our findings have brought to light what we’ve long known—the draft formaldehyde IRIS assessment is riddled with questionable decisions, poor process, and conflicts of interest.

“ACC is requesting EPA take immediate steps to ensure that the draft formaldehyde IRIS assessment isn’t used as a risk communication tool, to guide regulations, nor to set policy at any level of government until EPA corrects the process errors and produces a document that meets scientific standards worthy of public confidence,” said Dr. Kimberly Wise White, Vice President of Regulatory & Scientific Affairs, ACC. “Time and time again, we have tried to provide solutions to help the program enhance its scientific integrity and transparency. Our hope is this analysis sheds light on ways the IRIS program can restore its credibility.” 

Immediate steps include:

  • Imploring EPA to conduct its own investigation to maintain the integrity of its process to assess chemicals and ensure an unbiased formaldehyde IRIS assessment, including whether EPA policies on scientific integrity, peer review, and information quality have been violated and whether these process issues impact EPA’s legal obligations
  • Calling on EPA to release and take comment on the charge questions guiding NAS’s review of the draft formaldehyde IRIS assessment to facilitate greater review transparency
  • Urging NAS to conduct a thorough investigation to ensure an independent, objective review process, including:
    • A reset of the panel nomination process after the public comment period for the charge questions
    • Removal of any potentially biased panel members and NAS staff who lack independence or objectivity from the panel reviewing the draft IRIS assessment
  • Calling on the Office of Management and Budget to conduct a formal interagency review for the draft formaldehyde IRIS assessment before it is released

For more details about our investigation, including relevant documents obtained through FOIA, please visit our website at AmericanChemistry.com/TheRealStory.

American Chemistry Council

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) represents the leading companies engaged in the multibillion-dollar business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products, technologies and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health, safety and security performance through Responsible Care®; common sense advocacy addressing major public policy issues; and health and environmental research and product testing. ACC members and chemistry companies are among the largest investors in research and development, and are advancing products, processes and technologies to address climate change, enhance air and water quality, and progress toward a more sustainable, circular economy.

Related Content

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.

Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions