Overregulating the chemistry industry jeopardizes innovation, jobs, and economic growth. Learn more.

  • Read time: 2 minutes
  • Press Release

ACC to Testify Before House Science Committee

The Lautenberg Act requires EPA to use the ‘best-available science’ and a ‘weight of evidence’ process in all chemical evaluations to increase transparency and public trust

CONTACT US
Telly Lovelace
CONTACT US

WASHINGTON (Feb. 6, 2017) – Dr. Kimberly White, Ph.D., on behalf of the American Chemistry Council, will provide testimony tomorrow about the importance of increasing transparency and using the most up-to-date and relevant science in all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decision-making, especially in the federal chemical assessments that the Agency uses to inform regulatory decisions.

“While science and our understanding of chemicals have advanced, federal programs assessing potential chemical hazards and risks have not kept pace. EPA’s continued reliance on outdated science combined with the Agency’s lack of transparency is causing the public to lose trust in the Agency’s ability to assess chemicals. Without public trust, consumers lose confidence in regulatory decision-making, leading to product de-selection that is not supported by science, unwarranted public alarm and unnecessary costs,” said Dr. White, senior director of ACC’s Chemical Products and Technology Department.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (LCSA) mandates that EPA use of the best available science and a weight of evidence process to evaluate scientific information when prioritizing and evaluating chemicals for potential risks. Implementing these new provisions will require significant changes to EPA’s scientific evaluation procedures, not a simple reliance on past policy or practice, particularly for existing chemicals.

Dr. White continued, “Across EPA – and indeed the federal government as a whole – improvement in four distinct areas would enhance the evaluation and application of science in decision-making. These include: Establishing a clear framework for conducting chemical assessments; Applying consistent criteria for selecting and evaluating high quality, reliable scientific data; Transparency and objective integration of scientific evidence in decision-making; and Applying independent and robust peer review, which includes addressing peer review and public comments.”

“ACC looks forward to working with members of the Committee to ensure that high quality science is the foundation to regulatory decision making regarding potential chemical hazards and risks to human health and the environment,” said Dr. White.

American Chemistry Council

The American Chemistry Council’s mission is to advocate for the people, policy, and products of chemistry that make the United States the global leader in innovation and manufacturing. To achieve this, we: Champion science-based policy solutions across all levels of government; Drive continuous performance improvement to protect employees and communities through Responsible Care®; Foster the development of sustainability practices throughout ACC member companies; and Communicate authentically with communities about challenges and solutions for a safer, healthier and more sustainable way of life. Our vision is a world made better by chemistry, where people live happier, healthier, and more prosperous lives, safely and sustainably—for generations to come.

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.

Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions